Image: Thumbnail of Report Cover

Download PDFPDF version of guide [3.0MB]

Download PDFPDF of Quick reference card [0.3MB]

Download PDFTips for PDF and HTML versions [0.5MB]

Download PDFWord version of checklists [0.1MB]

4.3 Concluding remarks

Reflections of a project sponsor and decision-maker

“Some of the proudest and most enjoyable times of my career have been major APS policy implementations for which I was project sponsor, such as implementing a new national program that affected the lives of millions of Australians.

The best of these projects started from a firm foundation of project planning, with clear objectives and an appropriate timetable and budget. On the other hand, some of the more difficult times were projects that lacked a foundation of proper project planning.

When I was first promoted to the Senior Executive Service, I found that a huge volume of material went through my hands – so I had to learn how to focus on the most important things, and delegate the detail. I was now responsible for major decisions. To assist, staff provided me pages of detail, including alerting me to all the ‘ifs, buts and maybes’. Then I had to balance all the shades of grey, and crystallise them into yes, or no.

The relevance of that to my later role as a decision-maker on many projects across the Division was that I needed to work out the most important things to focus on in a project concept planning session or in a draft project business case, to help make that yes or no call. Over time, I privately boiled it down to four questions and two habits. The four questions (with variations) are:

  • Do I understand the project outcomes? What are the tangible measures? What exactly do we get for the money?
  • Who cares about the outcomes? How important are the outcomes to the department or Minister? Will partners work on the project enthusiastically?
  • Do I believe the time and cost? Who costed it; what is their track record; have they allowed for the inevitable problems? Will that money really deliver the outcomes?
  • What are the fallbacks? If along the way a ‘show stopper’ appears, is there a graceful exit or tolerable fallback?

The two habits are:

  • Make time for planning – a calm day of planning now is far preferable to a hectic week of problems later. I made time for stakeholders, guidance and review, and I allowed staff enough time for planning.
  • Pursue doubts – I found that if I had a hunch there was a weak spot in a business case, when it was looked into there often was a problem. So, if you are making the decision – listen to your inner voice. Better to ask the question and have it settled, than decide with a nagging doubt.”

Senior Executive, program delivery role..

This Guide has been prepared to assist executives with the challenges in planning and approving successful projects. There is guidance on supportive arrangements for planning at the entity level, and a structured approach to individual project planning and approval. The Guide provides practical support for the issues mentioned conversationally in the above case study: clarifying the purpose and value of the project, obtaining a robust assessment of its cost and feasibility, and setting the controls and governance for subsequent implementation.

The successful planning, approval, and implementation of projects contributes to the quality and efficiency of program delivery by government entities, and positions the executives involved for even more challenging projects in the future.