The ANAO could assess how selected entities are managing fiscal risks and significant liabilities that may affect the budget balances. A range of factors may influence actual budget outcomes. The Charter of Budget Honesty Act 1998 requires these factors to be disclosed in a statement of risks in each Budget and Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook. This statement outlines general fiscal risks, specific contingent liabilities and specific contingent assets that may affect the budget balances.

Construction of Western Sydney International (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport is underway and expected to begin operations in 2026. WSA Co Limited (WSA Co), a government business enterprise (GBE), was established in 2017 to develop and operate the Western Sydney airport. The ANAO could assess WSA Co’s strategies to manage the transition from building the infrastructure to operating the airport. This may include examining WSA Co’s transition activities such as the management of cargo and passenger services, infrastructure and key airport management contracts.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Defence’s (Defence) administration of sponsorship arrangements. Defence works with industry and other partners to develop capability (personnel and technology). A sponsorship arrangement could be entered into to support this capability development including for events, awards, training/education and other activities. The Department of Finance has provided a guidance document published in July 2015 that sets out the Australian Government Charging Framework in accepting sponsorships and directs the reader to Resource Management Guide: 302 Implementing the Charging Framework.

The ANAO could examine the assessment and decision-making in relation to the provision of financial support from the Critical Minerals Facility (Facility). It could also examine how Export Finance Australia satisfies itself that the Facility is growing Australia’s critical minerals sector and expanding downstream processing. The $4 billion Critical Minerals Facility was established in 2021 to provide financing to projects that are aligned with the Australian Government’s Critical Minerals Strategy 2023–30. The purpose of the Facility is to help projects suffering from gaps in private finance to overcome these gaps and get off the ground. The funding can come in the form of loans, loan guarantees, bonds and working capital support and is intended as a complement to commercial financing. Funding is intended to support Australian businesses to move further up the value chain to downstream processing, as well as businesses that are part of the critical minerals supply chain. When assessing whether it can support a critical minerals project, Export Finance Australia must consider: Australian benefit; whether the mineral is identified in the Strategy; whether a comprehensive feasibility study has been completed; buyer commitment to purchase the product; use of proven processing technology; and the proponent’s financial, technical and commercial capacity.

The ANAO could assess the governance arrangements in selected entities for monitoring and implementing agreed parliamentary committee and ANAO performance audit recommendations. Parliamentary committee and Auditor-General reports identify areas where administration can be improved and make recommendations to improve the delivery of outcomes. Once entities have agreed to implement performance audit recommendations, or in the case of parliamentary committee reports, the Australian Government has committed to the implementation of recommendations, timely implementation in line with the intended outcome of the recommendation is important in achieving the full benefit of the recommendation.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s administration and operation of the Recycling Modernisation Fund (RMF). The RMF was established in 2020 to support industry to transition to the regulation of waste exports, by increasing Australia’s onshore capacity to collect, reuse, recycle and recover waste materials. The Australian Government has committed to over $200 million towards new and upgraded recycling infrastructure through the RMF, with funding provided to states and territories via the Federation Funding Agreement–Environment and the National Partnership on Recycling Infrastructure.

The ANAO could assess Aboriginal Investment NT’s administration of grants. Aboriginal Investment NT, established in 2022, administers various community and business grant programs in the Northern Territory. A five-year strategic investment plan outlines key objectives for over $600 million in investment capital from the Aboriginals Benefit Account. Auditor-General Report No. 17 2024–25 found that Aboriginal Investment NT was partly effective in the management of conflicts of interest and made two recommendations to the entity.

The ANAO could assess whether the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) has effective procurement and contract management practices that comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Rules and achieve value for money. The audit could examine the planning, competitive processes, and probity controls in procurement activities, as well as the robustness of contract management arrangements to monitor performance, manage risks, and ensure deliverables meet agreed standards. It could also consider how DVA maintains transparency, supports accountability, and mitigates risks of fraud or non-compliance in the use of public funds.

The ANAO could assess the National Blood Authority’s administration of BloodNet. BloodNet is Australia’s national online blood ordering and inventory management system. It aims to provide hospitals, laboratories, and health service organisations with a secure, standardised way to order blood and blood products; manage inventory; monitor and report wastage; and support emergency planning. As an essential component of Australia’s blood and blood product logistical network, system failures or deficiencies can jeopardise timely access to blood and blood products for those that need them.

The ANAO could assess whether the conduct of the procurement for a National Police Check Systems Replacement (NPCSR) project employed open and effective competition and achieved value for money, consistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Rules. The NPCSR allows people to apply for a nationally coordinated criminal history check (previously known as a police check). Over 5 million checks are undertaken each year. Commencing with a market sounding process, the Australian Federal Police is conducting a procurement for a replacement system, with contract signature expected by the end of 2026.

The objective of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the ANAO’s attraction, retention and development of capability required to undertake the agency’s core activities. The Independent Auditor report — Performance Audit of Attraction, Development, and Retention of Capability — was tabled in Parliament on 15 August 2022.

This page lists status updates on the ANAO’s progress on recommendations contained in the audit report.

The focus of the audit was to examine recent selected property sales within the portfolios owning the majority of Commonwealth property, ie. those of Defence, Administrative Services and Veterans' Affairs. The approach taken in the audit was to select property sales from each of the three agencies and review the files and transactions related to those sales. The sales were evaluated against criteria which included establishment of sales timetables, sales methods, and completion processes such as the criteria for the selection of tenders and accountability. The objectives of the audit were to assess departments' management of the sale process associated with selected property sales with regard to:

• the extent to which the individual property sale objectives were achieved;
• how departments managed the sales to ensure that the Commonwealth received fair value;
• whether the departments' sale arrangements adequately protected the Commonwealth's interests, including minimising ongoing Commonwealth risk; and
• identifying principles of better practice employed by agencies in connection with these sales.

The Defence Estate comprises the land, buildings and other facilities that Defence uses across Australia. These facilities are vital to achieving the Defence mission - to prevent or defeat the use of armed force against Australia and its interests. The Estate has a gross replacement value of $14.8 billion. Defence Estate Organisation's (DEO's) Facilities Operations (FACOPS) Program delivers general maintenance and minor new works to Defence facilities on a regional basis across the country. DEO's Estate Operations and Planning Branch and its nine Regional Estate Centres are responsible for the FACOPS Program. Resources available for the Program have been reduced in recent years. The total DEO budget for 2000-01, which includes funds for capital works, facilities operations and property management, is $2.6 billion. Of this total, the FACOPS Program has a cash allocation of $213 million and an additional $15.6 million for employee expenses associated with the Program's 283 staff. The objective of the audit was to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of selected Defence facilities operations, including tendering and contracting, with a view to adding value with practical recommendations for enhancing operations.

The ANAO could assess whether the award of grant funding under the Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program was effective and consistent with the Commonwealth Grant Rules and Principles. The purpose of the program is to deliver community and sporting infrastructure, open space improvements and other community priorities. The program is being delivered as an invitation-only, closed non-competitive grants opportunity to fulfil community infrastructure commitments from the 2025 Federal election and from the 2025–26 Budget and Pre-Election Fiscal Outlook. It was opened to applications in September 2025 from more than 220 organisations and is valued at more than $560 million.

The ANAO could assess whether the award of grant funding under the Supporting Multicultural Communities Program was effective and consistent with the Commonwealth Grant Rules and Principles. The program is to provide direct support to multicultural community organisations. It is being delivered through seven invitation-only, closed non-competitive grants opportunities in three streams: infrastructure; amenities; and events and programs. The program is to fulfil the 2025 election commitments. The program guidelines identified the more than 160 organisations that were eligible to apply. Applications opened between October 2025 and April 2026, with $172 million in grant funding available.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s design and administration of the Partnerships for Infrastructure (P4I) program. This could include the performance of the Commonwealth partners contracted to implement the program. P4I is Australia’s flagship infrastructure development in Southeast Asia. Funded through Australia’s development program, it works with eight Southeast Asian countries and ASEAN to manage and deliver new infrastructure worth over AUD $50 billion annually. P4I was initially implemented by EY, Adam Smith International, The Asia Foundation and Ninti One. P4I is transitioning to a new phase of the program which will involve new contracts.

The ANAO could assess the administration of the Choice and Affordability Fund (CAF), including whether the fund is administered in line with the CAF Guidelines, whether reporting by funded entities supports the administration of the program, and whether the funding is achieving the intended outcomes, in accordance with funding agreements and the CAF Guidelines. The CAF is a $1.2 billion fund established in 2020 to support Catholic and independent schools to ‘deliver choice and affordability and achieve government priorities.’ The department allocates funding to non-government representative bodies, who allocate funding to schools, in accordance with funding agreements and work plans, which are approved by the department.

The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations manages a range of employment services programs, including Workforce Australia (allocated $1.5 billion in the 2025–26 Federal Budget), Transition to Work ($331 million), Parent Pathways ($99 million) and the Local Jobs Program ($27 million). These programs are delivered through a range of mechanisms including contracted service providers and online services. The ANAO could assess the delivery, program and contract management of these services, examining governance arrangements, risk and value-for-money considerations and performance monitoring/reporting.

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) was established on 1 July 1998 as the prudential regulator of banks and other authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), life insurance companies (including friendly societies), general insurance companies, superannuation funds and retirement savings accounts. ANAO's objectives for this audit were to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of APRA's prudential supervision of banks. Prudential supervision aims to protect depositors by ensuring that financial institutions adopt prudent risk management practices designed to ensure their continuing solvency and liquidity. APRA is a relatively new organisation, established in July 1998 and becoming responsible for prudential supervision of all ADIs from July 1999. ANAO concluded that there are steps APRA can take in a number of areas to improve its supervisory practices, including improving the administration of the ADI supervisory levy; strengthening its risk management approach; and maintaining closer adherence to international standards for prudential supervision issued by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. ANAO made five recommendations concerning administration of levies, risk-based supervision and supervision of cross-border banking. APRA agreed, or agreed with qualifications, to all recommendations, as well as agreeing with the overall audit conclusions.

The ANAO could assess the administration of Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) debt and repayments. HELP allows eligible students to defer the up-front costs of study, with repayments made through the tax system only after their income exceeds a certain threshold. In 2024–25, total outstanding debt was $82.2 billion in 2024–25, with an average time to repay of 10.2 years. In 2025–26, the Government reduced outstanding student debts by 20 per cent, forgiving $16 billion in debt.

The ANAO could assess Food Standards Australia New Zealand’s (FSANZ) management of risks associated with the health star rating system. Two in three Australian adults are overweight or obese, with diet and dietary choices a significant factor. Introduced in 2014, the health star rating system is jointly funded by the Australian and New Zealand governments and is intended to support consumers to make informed choices about the nutritional value of foods. In February 2026, Australian and New Zealand food ministers agreed to request FSANZ prepare a proposal on mandating the health star rating system in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.

The report summarises audit findings relating to entity internal control structures arising out of the interim financial statement audits of 21 Major Commonwealth entities for the year ending 30 June 2003. The interim audit examinations seek to update the ANAO's assessment of the internal control environment of entities reviewed, so as to determine whether reliance can be placed on those control structures to produce complete, accurate and valid information for financial reporting purposes. In addition this year's report provides observations on some key strategic issues and influences which are, or will be in the future, likely to affect the overall financial framework in the public sector

The ANAO could assess selected entities’ success in meeting one or more Australian Government requirements related to climate change and may assess the effectiveness of policy owners with respect to supporting entities to meet requirements.

The Australian Government has developed policies and requirements aimed at supporting the public service to respond to climate change. These include APS Net Zero Emissions by 2030; the Climate Risk and Opportunity Management Program; and the Commonwealth Climate Disclosure policy.

• APS Net Zero Emissions by 2030 aims to support the achievement of net zero in government operations by 2030. It includes the requirement for non-corporate Commonwealth entities to develop emissions reductions plans.
• The Climate Risk and Opportunity Management Program aims to support entities to consider climate risk and opportunities as part of decision-making processes and enterprise risk management.
• The Commonwealth Climate Disclosure policy is the Government’s policy for Commonwealth entities and Commonwealth companies to publicly report on their exposure to climate risks and opportunities, as well as their actions to manage them, delivering transparent and consistent climate disclosures to the Australian public.

The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the design and implementation of the EEIG program. The focus of the audit was the preparation for, and conduct of, the first funding round of the program.

The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the delivery of the first and second funding rounds of the Filling the Research Gap program by the Department of Agriculture.

The objective of the audit was to examine the effectiveness of DAFF's implementation and administration of the Securing our Fishing Future structural adjustment package industry and community assistance programs.

The objective of the audit was to assess the awarding of funding under the Supported Accommodation Innovation Fund against the requirements of the Commonwealth’s grants administration framework.

The objective of the audit was to examine the effectiveness of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s administration of the Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement Contractors Voluntary Exit Grants Program.

The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the design and management of the National Solar Schools Program (NSSP), including demonstrated progress towards achieving the program's objectives.

The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the design and implementation of the Liveable Cities Program, including the assessment and approval of applications.