2049 Items found
Published: Wednesday 17 December 2014
Published

The report objective is to provide the Auditor-General’s independent assurance over the status of 30 selected Major Projects, as reflected in the Statement by the Chief Executive Officer Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO), and the Project Data Summary Sheets prepared by the DMO, in accordance with the Guidelines endorsed by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit.

Entity
Defence Materiel Organisation
Published: Monday 13 December 2021
Published

The major projects report (MPR) is an annual review of the Department of Defence’s major defence equipment acquisitions, undertaken at the request of the Parliament’s Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA).

The purpose of the MPR is to provide information and assurance to the Parliament on the performance of selected acquisitions as at 30 June 2021. This is the 14th MPR since its commencement in 2007–08.

Entity
Department of Defence
Contact

Please direct enquiries through our contact page.

Updated: Tuesday 26 November 2024
Updated

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) must comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs) when procuring goods and services. The CPRs govern how ANAO procures goods and services and are designed to ensure the ANAO and taxpayers obtain value for money.

Contact

Please direct enquiries through our contact page.

Potential audit: 2025-26
Potential

This audit would assess the effectiveness of the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) management of confidential information.

The ATO manages commercially and legally sensitive information as part of its administration of the taxation and superannuation systems. Mobility between the public and private sector presents challenges to entities like the ATO to ensure that confidential information is not compromised. The provisions of the APS Code of Conduct, the Public Service Regulations 1999, the Privacy Act 1988, the Crimes Act 1914 and specific secrecy offences in Commonwealth laws outline the responsibilities of employees and agencies to manage confidential information.

Entity
Australian Taxation Office
Contact

Please direct enquiries through our contact page.

Published: Monday 25 October 2021
Published

The ANAO provided a case study to SAI Russia, as a follow-up to the Moscow Declaration SAI Russia is publishing a collection of case studies and best practices of strategic approach to public auditing. The case study was titled Using data analytics for risk-based performance audit planning.

Contact

Please direct enquiries through our contact page.

  • Public sector board members have of a duty to disclose and manage material personal interests. The composition of boards can include members who are appointed based on their specialist expertise and industry affiliations. This presents risks to corporate Commonwealth entities — the integrity of operations and functions of an entity can be compromised if conflicts of interest are not managed. Corporate Commonwealth entity boards should assess these risks and develop appropriate arrangements to manage conflicts of interest, including policies and procedures that are tailored to entity risks and training that is specific to board members’ roles. Establishing assurance activities over the management of board conflicts of interest can help to help to ensure arrangements are operating effectively.
  • Meaningful engagement with stakeholders can help ensure the objectives of a program are practical, achievable and reflect the needs of the community. The department established multiple channels of engagement, including public surveys and workshops, which provided effective mechanisms to consult with a wide range of stakeholders. Entities should ensure sufficient time is allowed in the design phase for this consultative process to occur and be aware of stakeholder consultation fatigue and adjust approaches accordingly.
  • The adequate and timely implementation of agreed audit recommendations is an important element of realising the full benefit of those recommendations. It also serves to demonstrate the entity’s commitment to improving public administration and being accountable to parliament.
  • Ongoing consideration by senior executives and the accountable authority of the effectiveness of fraud controls, residual risk ratings and changes to environmental factors should be documented to meet requirements under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, including when a decision has been made that no further action is required.
Published: Thursday 11 May 2006
Published

The objectives of the audit were to provide assurance that Artbank was effectively meeting its charter of: acquiring art by contemporary artists; expanding the number of public places that Artbank's collection is rented and displayed; and managing its collection and rental scheme. The audit also examined Artbank's governance arrangements, and its programmes for marketing, client development, performance management, budgeting, debt management and also sought client feedback on Artbank's operations via a survey.

Entity
Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Australia; Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts