2033 Items found
  • Identifying suitable comparators to assess efficiency against provides entities with an indicator of performance. Comparators can include past performance, organisations with comparable functions or processes, or appropriate targets.

The audit highlighted a number of messages about program evaluation, including:

  • Evaluation is a critical element of establishing accountability for program performance against objectives and providing insight to ensure ongoing improvement in program impact. Therefore, an evaluation framework needs to enable an assessment of achievement against objectives and sharing of evaluation outcomes.
  • Good evaluation practice includes:
    • Considering the evaluation approach during the design phase of a program.
    • Considering the budget and resources required to conduct the evaluation and report on its findings.
    • Establishing mechanisms to share evaluations such that similar programs can learn from evaluation findings.
    • Documenting follow up actions as a result of evaluation findings with key personnel held to account for delivering on the actions/recommendations.
    • Establishing quality assurance and control mechanisms to ensure that evaluations conducted are unbiased.
    • Embedding a comprehensive approach to evaluation practice, such as training, guidance, follow up and governance/oversight arrangements, to enable an evaluation culture to be established.
    • Publishing evaluation outcomes such that accountability and transparency is enhanced for stakeholders.
  • Where service delivery outcomes or capability requirements cannot be fully met, entities should consider the impact of the limitations on the ability to deliver the service and/or achieve the expected benefit. Where the limitations cannot be rectified, or resolved, entities should examine the contract and performance arrangements to ensure that they continue to be appropriate.
  • Where entities acquire new capabilities to achieve strategic priorities and objectives of government, entities should take a proactive role in contract management to ensure that the expected benefits are realised throughout the life of the project.
  • Entities should undertake timely reviews of long-running programs/activities to ensure they remain appropriately calibrated to achieve their intended policy outcomes in the most effective and efficient manner.
  • Entities should develop early in the program design phase fit-for-purpose evaluation strategies to regularly review the appropriateness of settings for long-term functions.
Published: Tuesday 1 May 2007
Published

The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the management by Defence and the DMO of the procurement of the modernised High Frequency communication capability for the ADF. The audit focussed on Phase 3A of the Project which commenced in the mid 1990's and involved the selection of the Prime Contractor; negotiation of the Prime Contract and the Network Operation and Support Contract; and the development and implementation of the Communication System.

Entity
Defence Materiel Organisation