The ANAO could assess the National Disability Insurance Agency’s (NDIA’s) framework and processes for setting, updating and communicating National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) pricing arrangements and price limits, including the annual pricing review, advice from the Independent Pricing Committee, and incorporation of external data and stakeholder feedback to balance participant access, provider viability and scheme sustainability.

Through its annual pricing review, the NDIA examines NDIS support categories, collects and analyses market data, benchmarks prices against other schemes, and seeks feedback through public consultation papers, and considers expert advice from the Independent Pricing Committee (which was established in September 2024). The NDIA publishes an annual pricing arrangements and price limits document, which sets out regulated price controls for NDIS supports and services, and a NDIS Support Catalogue, which lists available supports providers can use when lodging a payment request. These NDIS pricing arrangements are updated regularly. On 22 April 2026 the Minister for the NDIS announced reforms to the NDIS including changes to pricing arrangements.

The ANAO could assess the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s (NDIS Commission) use of regulatory tools and oversight of restrictive practices undertaken by NDIS providers. The NDIS Commission can use a range of regulatory tools and levers, including proactive tools to build quality in services provided and reactive tools (such as compliance notices, penalties and banning orders) to respond to provider non-compliance. The NDIS Commission has regulated restrictive practices under the NDIS since the entity was established in 2018. This includes monitoring the use of regulated restrictive practices and promoting their reduction and elimination.

For 2024–25, the NDIS Commission reported using 1,005 statutory enforcement tools, an increase of 214 per cent from 2023–24. Across the four quarters of 2024–25, the NDIS Commission reported an average of 5,613 participants were subject to unauthorised restrictive practices, and an average of 15,583 participants were subject to regulated restrictive practices.

The ANAO could assess the delivery of the National Firearms Register (NFR) Program. On 1 July 2024, the NFR Program commenced. This followed National Cabinet’s agreement on 6 December 2023 to deliver the most significant firearms reforms in Australia in 30 years (the NFR delivers on an outstanding reform from the 1996 Port Arthur response). The NFR is to be a federated operating model to achieve near real-time tracking of registered firearms and licence holders. Enabled by policy and legislative change, NFR is to collect and share information from Commonwealth, state and territory firearms registers, portals and management systems. The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) is responsible for leading the national program to establish the NFR. The ACIC is to upgrade existing national systems to enable the near real-time sharing of firearms and licence holder information; to include data from existing Home Affairs, Australian Border Force and Defence systems to enable tracing of firearms imports and exports.

The ANAO could assess Primary Health Networks’ (PHNs’) administration of Commonwealth grants funding. PHNs are a delivery model for primary health care with the main objectives of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of health services, particularly for those at risk of poor health outcomes; improving the coordination of health services; and increasing access and quality support for people. In 2023–24, the ANAO examined the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’s performance management of PHNs and the PHN delivery model. Auditor-General Report No. 19 2023–24 concluded that the department was partly effective in its performance management of PHNs and made seven recommendations.

The ANAO could assess the effectiveness of the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) arrangements for reducing and assessing the fringe benefits tax (FBT) gap. The tax gap is a measure used by the ATO to estimate the difference between the tax it expects to collect and the amount that would have been collected if every taxpayer was fully compliant with the relevant taxation law. The ATO estimates the FBT gap in 2022–23 was $1.8 billion or 30.4 per cent. This has consistently been the largest tax gap as a proportion of the potential tax base reported by the ATO since 2019–20.

The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations manages a range of employment services programs, including Workforce Australia (allocated $1.5 billion in the 2025–26 Federal Budget), Transition to Work ($331 million), Parent Pathways ($99 million) and the Local Jobs Program ($27 million). These programs are delivered through a range of mechanisms including contracted service providers and online services. The ANAO could assess the delivery, program and contract management of these services, examining governance arrangements, risk and value-for-money considerations and performance monitoring/reporting.

The ANAO could assess the progress of selected components of the Australian Government’s Digital Identity program including the effectiveness of the implementation, design and functionality of the Digital Identity System, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders and the allocation and expenditure of funding, including contract management.

The Digital Identity program is delivered by the Department of Finance (policy and program lead), with Services Australia and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) delivering critical operational functions. Components of the program include the Digital ID Act 2024, the Identity Exchanges (delivered by Services Australia), myID (the Commonwealth’s Identity Provider, delivered by ATO) and connected services to the system.

The Digital ID Act 2024 and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 commenced on 1 December 2024 and support the expansion of the Australian Government Digital ID System and introduce a voluntary accreditation scheme for digital ID services providers. The Digital ID Regulator is the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; and the Office of the Information Commissioner as the privacy regulator and Digital ID Data Standards Chair.

The ANAO could assess whether the Department of Social Services (DSS) had efficiently administered the community grants hub. The Australian Government introduced the Streamlining Government Grants Administration (SGGA) Program in 2015–16 with the objective of delivering simpler, more consistent and efficient grants administration across government. The Community Grants Hub (CGH) was established under the SGGA Program to provide community and health sector grants administration services to the largest 12 Commonwealth granting entities. These are the Attorney-General’s Department; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water; Department of Education; Department of Employment and Workplace Relations; Department of Health, Disability and Ageing; Department of Home Affairs; Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; Department of Social Services; National Indigenous Australians Agency; Department of Veterans Affairs; and Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts. DSS has administered the CGH since its commencement in 2016.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’s (DHDA) administration of grants for the headspace youth mental health program. Headspace is an Australian-Government funded program that provides supports for people aged 12 to 25 years who are experiencing, or at risk of, mild to moderate mental ill-health. Supports can be accessed in-person, online or by telephone. The first headspace service opened in 2007. Between July 2020 and December 2025, DHDA awarded over $980 million in grants related to headspace. In April 2025, the Prime Minister and the Minister for Health and Ageing committed over $200 million for 58 new, upgraded or expanded headspace services. In October 2025, the Australian Government announced $72.7 million for initiatives to reduce wait times and improve access across 85 headspace services. As at October 2025, there were 172 headspace services across Australia. DHDA is responsible for facilitating the delivery of national programs and services for mental health, including headspace. Australian Government funding for headspace is provided through grant agreements administered by DHDA, including to the National Youth Mental Health Foundation and Primary Health Networks.

The ANAO could assess First Nations partnership arrangements and funding design activities for the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s (DCCEEW’s) programs and activities impacting First Nations peoples. DCCEEW has a number of programs that impact on First Nations communities including supporting the management of Indigenous Protected Areas, cultural water flows, access to safe and reliable water and the First Nations Clean Energy Strategy 2024–2030. DCCEEW’s 2025–26 Corporate Plan identifies commitments to work in partnership and co-design with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In February 2025, DCCEEW released a First Nations Strategy 2025–2030.

The ANAO could assess the governance and performance of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA). GBRMPA is established under section 6 of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975. It has primary responsibility for applying the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park’s regulatory framework, which comprises the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Regulations 2019, and legislative instruments made under them such as the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003. The GBRMPA board, led by a chairperson appointed by the minister, is responsible for the management of the marine park under the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975. The Chief Executive Officer of GBRMPA is responsible for its day-to-day operations, and is GBRMPA’s accountable authority for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Industry, Science and Resources’ management of its decommissioning and rehabilitation activities. The department manages a range of complex decommissioning and rehabilitation activities, such as decommissioning the Northern Endeavour facility and overseeing the rehabilitation of the Ranger and the Rum Jungle former uranium mine sites.

The ANAO could assess the Australian Government’s planning and use of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence on core processes including governance, human resource management and fraud detection/prevention (internal controls).

The ANAO could assess the management of legal risks to ensure programs are implemented and delivered consistent with legislation. The audit or series of audits could explore the management of legal risks, lawfulness of decision making and/or lawfulness of payment calculations.

The ANAO could examine Services Australia’s management and recovery of debt. Services Australia provides a range of payments on behalf of nine Australian Government entities. Where overpayments are made Services Australia must raise and recover debt in accordance with relevant legislation. Services Australia identifies debt through a range of activities including tip-offs and the payment assurance program. There are a range of payment options available to customers with debt, including pausing debt recovery where customers are experiencing hardship or vulnerability. For customers who received social security payments, in 2024–25, Services Australia raised 1,400,365 debts with a value of $2.4 billion and recovered $1.6 billion. For Child Support, in 2024–25 57.6 per cent of active paying parents with a debt that is under a payment arrangement. In response to the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme Services Australia has developed a new debt management program in 2024–25, which it plans to review annually. A series of audits would examine the management of one or more type of debt, the aging and recoverability of debts, quality assurance programs, methods of detection, use of recovery agents, compliance and enforcement programs, performance measurement and monitoring, workforce capability and capacity and/or other matters relating to the management and recovery debt.

The ANAO could assess Services Australia’s framework for identifying and supporting vulnerable customers. Services Australia is responsible for delivering services and payments on behalf of government, including for social security, child support, emergency and health programs. Services Australia’s vision is ‘to make government services simple so people can get on with their lives’. Australians often require access to government support during periods of crisis. Services Australia must cater to customers with diverse needs, experiences, and abilities that significantly influence their interaction with the agency. Many individuals with complex needs or in vulnerable circumstancesΓÇöincluding those experiencing financial hardship, disability, domestic violence, or crisis eventsΓÇöface significant barriers to engaging via online, phone, or in-person channels. As of 30 June 2024, Services Australia employed 642 social workers across 211 locations to support these high-risk cohorts. In July 2025 Services Australia launched a ‘2030 Strategy’, in which it reaffirmed its commitment to a customer-centric approach to delivering services and incorporating the needs of vulnerable people into policy and process design.

The ANAO could assess the procurement (and/or contract management) of providers for the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children, specifically, the Leaving Violence Program. The Leaving Violence Program provides victims of domestic violence financial support and up to 12 weeks of services to promote their safety. DSS launched the Leaving Violence Program in July 2025, the successor to the Ending Violence Payment, and awarded the primary contract to Telstra Health. The program has been allocated $925.2 million over five years. The Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit expressed an opinion in its inquiry into the contract management frameworks operated by Commonwealth entities, that value for money is lost if good procurement is undermined by poor contract management.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Education’s design and delivery of the closed-circuit television (CCTV) assessment.

The assessment will explore the use of CCTV in up to 300 services being administered by the Nous Group, in consultation with the department, states and territories, subject matter experts, and early childhood education and care (ECEC) providers, educators, and families. The assessment is expected to be completed by the end of July 2026. The assessment does not seek to determine whether the number of child safety incidents go down, but rather to assess the effects CCTV may have on the perception of safety; how CCTV data can be best managed and leveraged; and the practical and technical considerations associated with CCTV use.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Education’s (Education) management and oversight of the development of the Schools Unique Student Identifier (USI). Australian primary and secondary school students will receive a USI by 2027. The USI is intended to travel with students throughout their school years and into post-school education. It is designed to support teaching, learning and wellbeing by tracking students between education systems, and support better policy development through the availability of joined up data on student pathways.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s design and administration of the Partnerships for Infrastructure (P4I) program. This could include the performance of the Commonwealth partners contracted to implement the program. P4I is Australia’s flagship infrastructure development in Southeast Asia. Funded through Australia’s development program, it works with eight Southeast Asian countries and ASEAN to manage and deliver new infrastructure worth over AUD $50 billion annually. P4I was initially implemented by EY, Adam Smith International, The Asia Foundation and Ninti One. P4I is transitioning to a new phase of the program which will involve new contracts.

The Australian Government is investing in venue infrastructure for the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games as well as high-performance programs through the Australian Sports Commission. The ANAO could examine clarity of governance arrangements, roles and responsibilities across entities involved; funding and investment decision-making processes including risk and value-for-money considerations; whether these arrangements protect Australian Government interests.

The ANAO could assess whether the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) has effective procurement and contract management practices that comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Rules and achieve value for money. The audit could examine the planning, competitive processes, and probity controls in procurement activities, as well as the robustness of contract management arrangements to monitor performance, manage risks, and ensure deliverables meet agreed standards. It could also consider how DVA maintains transparency, supports accountability, and mitigates risks of fraud or non-compliance in the use of public funds.

The ANAO could assess whether the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) has controls and processes to ensure payments to veterans and their dependants are accurate and timely. The audit could examine the integrity of payment calculations, and the adequacy of verification and quality assurance mechanisms by considering how DVA monitors error rates, addresses payment discrepancies, and manages risks that could impact the financial wellbeing of veterans and the proper use of public funds.

The ANAO could assess the Department of Treasury’s management and oversight of whether Commonwealth and state and territory objectives ‘to unlock quality, affordable housing supply over the medium term’ are achieved under the National Housing Accord. For example, by examining whether funding mechanisms for affordable housing have been carried out according to expected timeframes and requirements; or how state and territory governments’ implementation schedules are monitored, to ensure delivery of their affordable housing allocations.

The National Housing Accord was established in 2022. The accord aims to address housing supply challenges to ‘ensure Australians have access to safe, stable and affordable housing’ that is also ‘close to work, schools and transport’. This includes commitments for ‘immediate actions’ by the Commonwealth, states and territories to: deliver up to 20,000 new affordable dwellings – of which 10,000 will be delivered by the Commonwealth; collaborate to improve financing for new social and affordable housing projects; improve zoning, planning and land release and make sure the right skills are available and improving access to social and affordable housing. The Commonwealth committed $3.5 billion to state, territory and local governments to support the delivery of homes in line with the Accord’s target.

Housing Australia (HA), formerly the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation, is the independent national housing authority and supports the delivery of Australian Government programs to improve the supply of social and affordable housing. HA is responsible for administering the Commonwealth’s commitment of 10,000 affordable dwellings under the accord.

The ANAO could examine entity administration of selected aspects of the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Firearms and Customs Laws) Act 2026 including agency advice to the decision maker, on:

• the new power allowing the Minister for Home Affairs, or their delegate, to refuse permission to import a firearm or weapon, or related good, where the importation of that item poses a risk to the health, safety or security of the public or a sector of the public; and/or
• the new power enabling the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant, or to cancel, a visa, on the basis of hate motivated conduct and offences relating to the spread of hatred and extremism;
• implementation by the Australian Border Force of arrangements to give effect to amendments to customs regulations that will prohibit the import and export of violent extremist material and prohibited hate symbols; and/or
• the establishment of a National Gun Buyback Scheme.

The ANAO could assess the establishment of the Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve. Critical minerals (cobalt, lithium, manganese, rare earth elements, tungsten and vanadium) are essential inputs to the modern economy. Critical minerals are used in batteries, rare earth permanent magnets, semiconductors, defence technologies and as catalysts for hydrogen production. The Critical Minerals Strategy 2023–2030 seeks to create diverse, resilient and sustainable supply chains; build sovereign capability in critical minerals processing; help Australia become a renewable energy superpower; and extract more value from onshore resources. In April 2025, the Australian Government committed to establish a Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve to maximise the strategic value of Australia’s critical minerals. The government allocated $1.2 billion to establish the reserve in the 2025–26 Federal Budget. A taskforce established in the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet to support the development of the reserve transferred to the Department of Industry, Science and Resources in December 2025. It is anticipated that the reserve will be operational in the second half of 2026.

The ANAO could assess the implementation of one or more aspects of the Australian Government’s environmental protection law reforms. Environmental protection law reforms were passed by the Australian Parliament on 28 November 2025. These reforms were introduced in response to the statutory review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) conducted by Professor Graeme Samuel AC in 2020. The review found that ‘Australia’s natural environment and iconic places are in an overall state of decline and are under increasing threat’, including from climate change. The review found that the EPBC Act is ineffective, outdated and in need of fundamental reform to address current and future challenges. The reforms are focused on three ‘pillars’: stronger environmental protection and restoration; more efficient and robust project assessments; and greater accountability and transparency in decision making. Key aspects of the reforms include: the introduction of National Environmental Standards; new assessment pathways for environmental approvals; a new framework for restoration; the establishment of the National Environmental Protection Agency; and change to Environment Information Australia.

The ANAO could assess Services Australia’s strategic planning for ICT systems. Services Australia administers a range of systems supporting the delivery of government services including: whole of government systems such as myGov and Digital ID; systems supporting the delivery of programs such as welfare payment systems; and ICT supporting corporate shared services. Whole of government and welfare payment systems are considered critical national infrastructure. A key enterprise risk identifies the need for Services Australia to maintain ICT service continuity, while developing and maintaining systems that are fit for purpose, resilient and secure. The Services Australia’s capability review observed that a number of critical systems delivering payments and services are ageing. These systems impede the ability to integrate new technologies, are costly to maintain and are preventing Services Australia implementing efficiencies and innovations to delivering programs and services. Many of these ageing systems rely on staff with specialist programming skills. To address these challenges Services Australia established a cross entity advisory board to develop a 10-year ICT Architecture Strategy and Plan by June 2025. The audit could examine oversight, development and/or implementation of strategic plan for ICT systems.

The ANAO could assess whether the strategic refocus of the Export Market Development Grants (EMDG) scheme has achieved its objective of delivering more impactful grants to high-quality exporters, with a greater focus on key diversification markets. Since 1974, the EMDG has been the Australian Government’s flagship program for supporting Australian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) aiming to expand into international markets. In 2021–22, the EMDG shifted from a reimbursement scheme to an eligibility-based, demand-driven program and this resulted in higher demand but lower grant amounts. The most recent funding round included a number of significant changes intended to improve program outcomes.

The ANAO could assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia’s (FCFCOA) client services arrangements, including court transcription services, complaint handling arrangements and/or timeliness of case management. The FCFCOA deals with family law applications, general law applications including fair work, bankruptcy, consumer law, human rights, administrative law and intellectual property and migration law. In September 2021, the FCFCOA commenced. The court replaced two federal courts: The Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia. The stated purpose of this merger was to ‘create greater efficiencies in the federal family law court system and, in turn, assist families navigating the court system during what can be some of the most difficult and distressing times of their lives.’