The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Department of the Treasury’s design and implementation of the Measuring What Matters framework.

The effective use of financial information is a critical component of an organisation's performance management framework. The appropriate combination of financial and non-financial data reflects overall organisational performance, and performance at program and work unit levels. The objective of this audit was to assess what financial information is currently used, who uses it and how well it is used. The audit also assessed whether the current processes for defining, accumulating and producing financial information were appropriate for the new accrual based performance management framework, which is to be in place for 1999/2000.

Government entities continue to commission and deploy major ICT systems to improve service delivery, financial management, regulatory capability, or operational efficiency. Effective design, implementation, and management of residual risks and issues is important in ensuring investment in new systems is effective and achieves outcomes. The ANAO could examine whether selected entities have effectively planned and implemented new ICT systems, including ensuring risks are identified and managed, data governance arrangements are adequate, and appropriate assurance is obtained regarding the effective operation of the system prior to commissioning.

The ANAO could examine the Department of Home Affairs’ (Home Affairs) management of the transition to a new surveillance services contract. In its Report 498, the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA) recommended that the ANAO undertake a performance audit of the Department of Home Affairs’ transition to the new surveillance services contract. In late 2021, Home Affairs varied the existing contract to extend its completion date by six years (to 31 December 2027) and increasing its estimated cost by $991 million (to $2.6 billion). Auditor-General Report No. 6 2021-22, which was reviewed by the JCPAA, had concluded that the department’s management of the contract had not been effective and, as a result, while surveillance services have been provided, the quantum and range of those services has fallen short of the contractual requirements. Transition activities under a new contract are scheduled to conclude in June 2028.

The objective of the audit was to assess FSANZ's administration of its food standard functions, as specified in the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act, 1991 (last amended 2007).
Particular emphasis was given to whether:

• FSANZ's performance management and reporting provided effective support and ensures accountability;
• FSANZ effectively administered its food standard development and variation function, including its stakeholder management; and
• FSANZ effectively monitored the implementation of its standards and coordinates relevant jurisdictions to address market failures.

Mr Ian McPhee - Auditor-General for Australia, presented at the launch of the ANAO-PM&C Better Practice Guide: Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives

The fleet oiler HMAS WESTRALIA was a key element of the Royal Australian Navy (hereafter referred to as ‘Navy') Maritime Operations Support Capability (MOSC) from 1989 until September 2006. WESTRALIA provided logistic support to naval operations and exercises and contributed to Defence international engagement through these activities. The new vessel to replace WESTRALIA is called HMAS SIRIUS and was commissioned by Defence in mid September 2006, which was concurrent with the formal decommissioning of WESTRALIA. This approach was adopted by Defence to ensure that Navy maintained a continuous afloat support capability.

The audit reviewed the Defence's $5.05 billion New Submarine Project which commenced in 1982 and involves design and construction of six Collins class submarines and associated supplies and services. The objectives of the audit were to assess project management by the Department's Project Office in the light of accepted better-practice project management techniques. It also aimed to derive lessons learnt and recommendations that could be applied to the Project and to similar Defence projects now and in the future. The audit follows a 1992 audit of the Project by the ANAO and a review by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts in 1995.

The objective of the audit was to assess whether the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP) had appropriately managed the procurement of garrison support and welfare services at offshore processing centres in Nauru and Papua New Guinea (Manus Island); and whether the processes adopted met the requirements of the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs) including consideration and achievement of value for money.